Scott Peterson found guilty...

[tom]

Now hopefully the media will shutup about it.

[Polaris]

what the hell was that guy thinking anyway?
i mean
heres his newly wed wife, with child, and he murders them
yes thats plural- them- so if you are pro-choice, youre no better, just fyi
what a moron

[laserflip]

polaris, STFU; he was innocent. they had no REAL evidence, no motive, no weapon, even. they didnt even know for sure how she died! thats insane! and just because of the myriad of flaws in the states' judicial system, a person can now no longer enjoy any form of freedom. its sick. the united states sucks ass; i welcome another 9/11...in fact, i would laugh my FUCKING ass off. i wouldnt care if terrorists nuked the shit out of the USA tomorrow, teach those judicial system bastards a lesson. and if he gets the death penalty, those jurors are now the murderers, and they deserve to die. fucking america. damn you to hell. seriously. why cant it be like doom and just a portal to hell open up and destroy everyone?! FUCK FUCK FUCK that makes me sick. that could have been me framed of murder. it could be you, or anyone. sick shit right there. fuck america fuck fuck fuck son of a bitch DIE god dammit! seriously put a fucking shotgun up all their cockholes and pull the trigger 24901823438290 times

[Polaris]

hum
after looking at the case now for the first time in the long time i havent heard much about it (http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/11/12/peterson.verdict/index.html) it seems that this guy was pretty suspicious, but at the same time he didnt have much physical evidence against him.
so...
i just dont know how to justify the affairs, the hair color change, and the $15k after the death of his wife
i know that if my wife died, i would go into severe depression- not maintain a current affair and change my hair color. it just doesnt sit with me
im not even gonna touch the rest of your post, laser, mainly because i think youre just venting. if youre serious, theres nothing mandating you stay here in america, unless youre a minor, then i guess you can make your choice in a few years

[Kraftwerk]

Fact is two people are dead. Someone did it. I am not so sure despite his actions that he did. Being as objective as I can be I think there is more too this one than meets the eye. Just my opinion.

[MVB]

There was no real physical evidence against him. It was entirely circumspect and conjecture. I don't care if he did it or not, he should have been acquitted because there was not anything to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did it. Juries can really fuckin' suck sometimes.

What really irritates me, more than anything else, is how our judicial system, and our country in general, can toss about the idea of what a baby is without second thought.

Go to doc's office, kill unborn child ... it's just a fetus, totally legal.
Kill wife, and kill unborn child by default along with her ... it's an unborn baby, totally illegal, double murder.

What the fuck? I dare anyone to talk to me on IM and prove that an unborn baby is somehow NOT a human being; I totally agree with the double murder case, but I hate how people just ignore or stretch the definitions of baby and human being and murder to suit them, rather than to suit fact and justice.

[Polaris]

mvb, you stole the words right out of my mouth

[Kraftwerk]

Amen. He really is wise isn't he ?

[tom]

polaris, STFU; he was innocent. they had no REAL evidence, no motive, no weapon, even.

Like you said, no murder weapon, etc, so no way to prove him innocent either.

Another 9/11 isn't going to affect the judicial system.

You wouldn't be laughing if you and your family happened to be where the terrorists would attack, would ye?

[laserflip]

i most certainly would; i wouldnt give a fuck. yes, im venting. and stealth; my point is, there should be no need to prove him innocent. america is SUPPOSEDLY based on this principle among others. i also believe he should have been acquitted, but because of the prosecution's "mind games" to make the jury despise scott, he was found..guilty. congratulations, america; murder cases are decided not by the innocence or guilt of the person, but the opinions of some random people off the fucking street, and the cunning and level of morality of the attorneys; how far beyond the bounds of morality ARE these people willing to step to put an innocent man away? "i'm just doing my job", they say. well, if you value your everlasting soul, get a new job you filthy bastard, or laser is going to send ur ass straight to fucking hell on a 1 way ticket.

Edit: the reason this was considered a human is beacuse its just another charge to slap onto Scott Peterson, because they slam people with every charge they can. "It's their job". I think the jon of a prosecution attorney should be to find the truth, not prosecute at all costs, no matter what their opinion on his innocence is. I firmly believe that every prosecuter in the courtroom, and indeed every state's attorney involved, had at least SOME doubts about his guilt. I bet it tortures them every night in bed, so that they cannot sleep and stay awake at night with this gnawing at their conscience until they finally cannot stand it any longer, and decide to end it all...but only before smearing Scott Peterson's DNA all over the gun they are about to kill theirself with, just so he will get more charges.

[Polaris]

laser, it is standard law to try someone for double murder for killing a pregnant woman. the prosecuters werent stretching it, they were just accusing where the law provided- once for the mother, once for the child. its like that every time a pregnant woman is killed, and thats where abortion's double standard comes into play
yes, prosecuters, and probably lawyers in general are untrustworthy. thats why i was doubtful of edwards from the begining. good thing kerry didnt get elected.
hum
this is becoming incredibly political, and i suppose im somewhat to blame... oh well

[vacio]

1 word, politics

[JADezimar]

Now every cheater that ends up with a dead wife can be sent to death row.

(P.S. I think he did it, But that doesnt mean that you can tag him as a murderer just cuase of his characteristics.)

[Justice]

There was no real proof of his murder. The media grossly overcovered the case. The juries did a terrible job.

But what happens happens ... you can't change the judicial system. It's not up to us to determine whether he's innocent or not, but the fact is he's been found guilty and will have to face what the judge is gonna give him.

cheers, and
-=</|awesomeparty|\>=-

[Polaris]

theyre not gonna give him the death penalty. there's almost no way, unless the judge is already dead set on it. if i were him, even though im pro-death penalty, i wouldnt give him it. i think he did it, but i dont think theres enough evidence to be absoultely sure he did.