PDA

View Full Version : GW and Mental Pigmies

Polaris
Apr 23, 2007, @ 04:36 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,267783,00.html

While we're on the GW debate, lets bring in the lampoons.
Karmashock
Apr 23, 2007, @ 04:47 PM
I don't know what to make of that... literally... I have no opinion...
RazielDemon
Apr 24, 2007, @ 10:52 AM
yay, let's poke fun at minor celebrities while australia chokes on sand wootsies :D

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/australasia/article2465960.ece


lol, seriously, this guy is just so funny:

Mr Howard has softened his rhetoric of late, and says that he now broadly accepts the science behind climate change. He has tried to regain the political initiative, announcing measures including a plan to take over regulatory control of the Murray-Darling river system from state governments.
Karmashock
Apr 24, 2007, @ 04:24 PM
yay, let's poke fun at minor celebrities while australia chokes on sand wootsies :D

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/australasia/article2465960.ece


lol, seriously, this guy is just so funny:
right, and they've never had a drought before... Oh it's the worst drought evvvah!!! Please.

I'm tired of every little thing being attributed to GW without any linking evidence. Every time it's summer the eco retards point at the sky and say "it's HOT"...

Never mind the blizzards in DC while they were having their silly ass GW conventions...
Polaris
Apr 24, 2007, @ 06:14 PM
I don't know what to make of that... literally... I have no opinion...
You don't need an opinion for bear (or, rather, celeb) bating. Just a sense of humor.

Btw, my Calculus instructor last semester wrote a report on how climate changes in latin america affect Australia 10 years later. Based on 500 or so years of data, he established a direct dependency on droughts and rainy seasons. Maybe it's just coincidence (no, he didn't have a copy on him walking out of class the day I asked) but I think its at least interesting
Karmashock
Apr 24, 2007, @ 06:24 PM
Btw, my Calculus instructor last semester wrote a report on how climate changes in latin america affect Australia 10 years later. Based on 500 or so years of data, he established a direct dependency on droughts and rainy seasons. Maybe it's just coincidence (no, he didn't have a copy on him walking out of class the day I asked) but I think its at least interesting
I'm not an expert but that sounds very fishy.
MVB
Apr 24, 2007, @ 06:34 PM
OMG ALL THOSE DRASTIC WAY WORSE THAN TODAY WEATHER CHANGES THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO WERE DUE TO COAL BURNING ALIENS OKKKKK LET'S KEEP ARGUING ABOUT the relatively tiny fucking ones today -.-
Apocalypse
Apr 24, 2007, @ 07:11 PM
Butterfly effect...... btw I just farted.
MVB
Apr 24, 2007, @ 08:31 PM
Cool. Was it rosy?
Karmashock
Apr 25, 2007, @ 10:26 AM
Cool. Was it rosy?
so that means it will rain in boston in 10 years?